Met with Steve today to reflect on my practice to date.
Began by showing him this blogger where I record the evidence of meeting my PTC
Linda PTC Reflections
Thursday, 18 August 2016
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
Friday, 27 May 2016
Flynn effect
The Flynn effect is the substantial and long-sustained increase in both fluid and crystallized intelligence test scores measured in many parts of the world from roughly 1930 to the present day. When (IQ) tests are initially standardized using a sample of test-takers, by convention the average of the test results is set to 100 and their standard deviation is set to 15 or 16 IQ points. When IQ tests are revised, they are again standardized using a new sample of test-takers, usually born more recently than the first. Again, the average result is set to 100. However, when the new test subjects take the older tests, in almost every case their average scores are significantly above 100.
Test score increases have been continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to the present. For the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, subjects born over a 100-year period were compared in Des Moines, Iowa, and separately in Dumfries, Scotland. Improvements were remarkably consistent across the whole period, in both countries.[1] This effect of an apparent increase in IQ has also been observed in various other parts of the world, though the rates of increase vary.[2]
So what does this mean?
We rest and by default over time the scores go up.
Are we older people less intelligent?
http://www.tv3.co.nz/WORLD-CLASS-INSIDE-NZ-EDUCATION-A-SPECIAL-REPORT-World-Class-Inside-NZ-Education-A-Special-Report/tabid/3692/articleID/126943/Default.aspx
Working with different data- Evidence to accelerate
Working with data concepts
This data evidence is a rich part of KEP. We are data rich at our school and i do believe we over assess as well.
What and how we use data is so relevant to the success of outr akonga
Standards-based assessment
Standards-based assessment allows us to make judgments about the level of an individual's learning with respect to shared benchmarks of expected performance, supported by exemplars.
Reliability and validity
The reliability of an assessment tool is the extent to which it measures learning consistently. The validity of an assessment tool is the extent by which it measures what it was designed to measure.
Percentages, percentiles, and stanines
In order to understand and analyse data from an assessment tool, you need to know the differences between the ways that different tools measure student achievement, and what that might mean for your analysis.
Norms
Norms are statistical representations of a population, for example PAT maths scores for year 6 males, or e-asTTle reading scores for year 9 Māori females.
Effect size
A good way of presenting differences between groups or changes over time in test scores or other measures is by ‘effect sizes’, which allow us to compare things happening in different classes, schools or subjects regardless of how they are measured
Working with data topics
Loading or downloading data onto a spreadsheet
There are several ways by which quantitative data in the form of scores can be entered into a spreadsheet. Data can be downloaded from a digital assessment tool or student management system.
Cleaning and formatting data
When working with data to analyse results and draw conclusions, it is essential that the data with which you are working is ‘clean’. This means that it is consistent, accurate and complete.
Creating your own simple graphs
Graphs (also called charts) play an important role in data analysis. A graphic representation can make the relationship between sets of data much easier to understand.
Disaggregating data
Student achievement data is often reported for whole populations (for example: cohorts, year levels, whole class). This is called aggregate data.
Thursday, 26 May 2016
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Kia eke panuku 24th May
The use of the observation tool was followed up in PLD on tuesday 24th May.
We looked at this and used a video recording of KWi and LNi for the purpose of working towards completing an observation tool.
Questions arising were
1. What do we record- we need evidence not simply observations in general
2. The energy these take
The session was surprising in that not all staff follow instructions and found it difficult to get into groups and write. It was asked why we didn't do this as a full group. Reason is that we can differentiate in small group d and its the conversations that are richer in smaller groups.
We will follow up with the tick and the POWERFUL CONVERSATION leading to the shadow coaching
We looked at this and used a video recording of KWi and LNi for the purpose of working towards completing an observation tool.
Questions arising were
1. What do we record- we need evidence not simply observations in general
2. The energy these take
The session was surprising in that not all staff follow instructions and found it difficult to get into groups and write. It was asked why we didn't do this as a full group. Reason is that we can differentiate in small group d and its the conversations that are richer in smaller groups.
We will follow up with the tick and the POWERFUL CONVERSATION leading to the shadow coaching
CR and RP Observation Tool
This is the
collaborative result from unpacking the tool
|
|
Sounds-looks-feels like, examples
|
FINAL KEY WORDS
|
|
WIG
|
|
|
|
Teacher is talking to W- Whole class , I- Individual,
G-Group
|
||
|
Transmission
|
||
|
Other
|
Anything that doesn’t fit below or if
we are unsure
|
Teacher lead
|
|
Instructional
|
Teacher Dominated
No
sharing power
Teacher talking - giving instructions
Teacher at the front - initial
guidelines/content
|
Teacher Dominated
Teacher Driven
|
|
Monitoring
|
doing the roll
passive watching/anecdotal notes
cruising the class
teacher movement and asking questions
giving one on one instruction
group work
strict observation, marking tests
checking work
|
teacher low interaction
scanning
interaction
|
|
Feed-back Behaviour
|
Behaviour discussions - comments
- 4 to 1 praise
positive reinforcement
stop that, that's good/that isn't
marking tests
stop clicking your pen
|
Teacher Driven
re directing behaviour
|
|
Feed-forward Behaviour
|
Discussion/Expectations for next time -
next steps
positive reinforcement
sit down, shut up .....over there
encouraging good behaviour
|
Teacher Driven
setting expectations
|
|
Dialogic
|
||
|
Cultural tool kit
|
greetings
relationships
Marae kit - displays on wall
Date
Use of basic maori words in teaching
all positive relationship with all
students in particular maori
skills brought in from
background/experience
kit of knowledge about what teacher and
student culturally bring to classes
|
Inclusive
student driven
|
|
Feed-back Academic
|
Assessment Learning conversations
when marking is done - conversation
|
student the focus and take
responsibility of their own learning
assessment
|
|
Feed-forward Academic
|
where to next - date student books
what's next? get a ......pen DJ
Goal setting
|
student driven
next steps
|
|
Co construction
|
working together
collaboratively planning - learning
experiences
Shared direction from shared
understanding
|
student driven
working together
|
|
Relationships
|
||
|
Belief in and care for Maori learners
Manaatitanga
|
Manaatitanga
Ako
knowing names, ID Maori, pronunciation
including knowing parallel cultural.....different approach kinesthetic
learning
knowing your students
|
|
|
High Expectations for Maori learners
and their learning
Mana-motuhake
|
All in together
Need to push and expose them to role
modelling
pushing students - have belief in
students
|
Resilience
empathy
|
|
Well managed learning context, focussed
on learning
whakapiringatanga
|
Planning (classroom - department)
Learning styles and focus groups
Students know what they are doing and
that it is relevant to them
planning around curriculum
|
planning
|
|
Effective teaching strategies to
promote learning
ako
|
Think Pair Shared/Group
Best evidence
Group work. Positive praise for learning steps
awareness of barriers
heart beat monitor ..................M.......
|
|
|
Evidenced based learning
whakataunaki
|
Assessment/ data / proof
teaching based around curriculum
|
|
|
Accelerating improvement for Maori
learners
Whai pikinga
|
challenging new learning
co constructive learning
|
|
HOD meeting 23rd May 2016
Meeting held on 23rd May 2106
1.DARE template for departments RDr
|
PB4L have shared a document for each department to pull the DARE apart and contextualise it to our areas.
Indicate what we give token for. |
2. Numeracy across departments RDr
|
Postponed till later but
|
3a Appraisal/Inquiries SAb
|
Back in departments we must look at these and make staff accountable and use the data from 8 to push this point
How can I make inquiry relevant to raise year 11 achievement
|
3b Sharing department inquiry (focus on evidence gathering) KBl
|
Katie shared her inquiry- Solo and data analysis
|
4. Assemblies KBl
|
KBl brought to the views of year 12 students
What is the purpose of these, why, what do we want from these, who will organise it?
Can we survey the students? |
5. House Competitions SAb/KBl
|
This is open for grabs and Katie asked if anyones to take it on but not particularly an HOD.
|
6. Chrome books LNi
|
Chrome boxes arriving 27th May 2016
Each area is responsible for booking their chrome books out.
They are located I Nelson block and Year 7 and 8 area.
|
7. Achievement data SAb
|
See the manilla folder handed out. It contains info from Kamar that may have errors.
There are some starting figures here especially our year 11 data ( year 12,13 is very different)
Key learning- what are we going to do as a school, department, individual Need to look at engagement of our students- focus of our TOD |
AOB
|
How can we put P into kamar?
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)